Yeah, it's always great when you can get the pro-abortion side talking about just how nuts you are. American RTL is doing just that, providing fodder for abortion supporters like HR Reality check. They've got us picturing their vice-president in a morality measuring contest. It's not pretty. I think they're dead-on (excuse the pun) when they say he's attention-starved.
It's also absurd that they're using that Chinese woman to make a point. Hasn't she been used enough; they're only fueling the flames.
For once, I'd like to see American RTL and/or Colorado RTL in the news for something they've done that was productive or substantive. No, I would settle for sane. It's a good thing the pro-aborts don't have to settle for sane.
30.4.08
Give me a break?
Oh, Judy! Miss Judy Brown is at it again, bashing real pro-life work and championing religious warfare (I'm only joking. She's probably a pacifist, she really looks peaceful in her signature, relaxed "Judie's Blog" pose.) In her April 25 blog post, she maligns incrementalism and puts herself in the same camp with other theonomists like Bob Enyart who want to see a divinely chosen king and Old Testament style legalism replace our current government. I don't make those accusations too lightly, but I value my freedom and I love this country.
I mean, the title of her blog entry basically invites criticism. She's talking about the absence of logic, then doesn't lay out the argument she opposes, and then tells us it's a bad position because it's not her position because it's consistent...with her position.
Oh, and she also seems to agree with Planned Parenthood of Colorado quite a bit. I suppose they have a lot in common like the ability to make enough money to built a tripped-out website and talk an awful lot. I shouldn't laugh, it shows ALL is at least part of this century.
I mean, the title of her blog entry basically invites criticism. She's talking about the absence of logic, then doesn't lay out the argument she opposes, and then tells us it's a bad position because it's not her position because it's consistent...with her position.
Oh, and she also seems to agree with Planned Parenthood of Colorado quite a bit. I suppose they have a lot in common like the ability to make enough money to built a tripped-out website and talk an awful lot. I shouldn't laugh, it shows ALL is at least part of this century.
20.2.08
Sweet Georgia
The Georgia state legislative committee voted to table HR 536, the GA Human Life Amendment. This means a vote on it has indefinitely postponed...and not a moment too soon.
It is not against pro-life principles to be against a state human life amendment at this juncture. Consider that the GA committee chairman said that the proposed amendment "[sought] to make a direct attack on Roe v. Wade." Simply based on observations like this, the US Supreme Court could easily strike the state amendment down based on passed precedence. The amendment is crafted specifically to attack Roe and meant to place a significant obstacle in the way of women seeking an abortion. Those aren't necessarily bad things, but they will create a judicial precedent used to kill federal Human Life Amendment.
I know Georgia Right to Life had supported the amendment, but neither National Right to Life nor the Catholic Bishops did. It may be that the state group needed to give support in order not to offend their members, but it certainly shows a lack of understanding. But that's just me.
It is not against pro-life principles to be against a state human life amendment at this juncture. Consider that the GA committee chairman said that the proposed amendment "[sought] to make a direct attack on Roe v. Wade." Simply based on observations like this, the US Supreme Court could easily strike the state amendment down based on passed precedence. The amendment is crafted specifically to attack Roe and meant to place a significant obstacle in the way of women seeking an abortion. Those aren't necessarily bad things, but they will create a judicial precedent used to kill federal Human Life Amendment.
I know Georgia Right to Life had supported the amendment, but neither National Right to Life nor the Catholic Bishops did. It may be that the state group needed to give support in order not to offend their members, but it certainly shows a lack of understanding. But that's just me.
12.2.08
Now it's really sad!
There was a tremendous blog on the destructive behavior of "American Right to Life," a group which exists for some unfathomable purpose. They are truly the terrorists of the pro-life movement who have taken the easier path of tearing things down over the difficult and right path of building things up.
A further example of their despicable behavior is their explicit lying in a recent press release which was picked up by a few media outlets in which they said National Right to Life had endorsed both Fred Thompson AND Mitt Romney. It's just as I had said in my January 17th entry: they are putting out disinformation. There was a reply to that entry which was as misleading as the press releases themselves.
If this group tries to tear down any more pro-life towers and hand delivers the presidency to the pro-aborts (and by this I DON'T mean John McCain who is the pro-life option), then they are simply people "principled" beyond reason.
A further example of their despicable behavior is their explicit lying in a recent press release which was picked up by a few media outlets in which they said National Right to Life had endorsed both Fred Thompson AND Mitt Romney. It's just as I had said in my January 17th entry: they are putting out disinformation. There was a reply to that entry which was as misleading as the press releases themselves.
If this group tries to tear down any more pro-life towers and hand delivers the presidency to the pro-aborts (and by this I DON'T mean John McCain who is the pro-life option), then they are simply people "principled" beyond reason.
24.1.08
Fred's Out
It's too bad that Fred Thompson is out of the race. I know better than to badmouth any of the other candidates because I will end up having to vote for one of them. I'm just disappointed that this election will be based on superficialities. Democrats can vote for the black one, the woman or the lawyer, Republicans can vote for the wealthy Mormon, the 9/11 guy, the Baptist preacher, the war vet, or the crazy (that's right, Ron Paul...or quite frankly anyone who believes in him). No one will try to get any deeper. That's something to be frightened about.
17.1.08
It's more than a little sad...
"American Right to Life" Action put out a press release yesterday condemning, among other thing, the support National Right to Life has given to Mitt Romney in his presidential bid. What planet are they on? What support was that? Did it help him when they endorsed Fred Thompson? Or maybe when a couple of their state organizations endorsed Mike Huckabee...surely that's what must have helped Mitt's campaign along?
Maybe they're just hoping that if they say something that people will think it's true. Between that and the creepy anti-Romney ad they produced, I'm not sure how anyone can take them seriously.
Maybe they're just hoping that if they say something that people will think it's true. Between that and the creepy anti-Romney ad they produced, I'm not sure how anyone can take them seriously.
13.12.07
Kudos to Fred
Fred Thompson has picked up not only the endorsement of the National Right to Life, but also so many of its affiliates that I think it would be hard to say that he does not have the support of pro-lifers across the country.
I read this Fred blog talking about him making a comeback and taking Iowa. I certainly hope they are on to something. I believe it.
Fred did a tremendous job at that last debate. Kudos to him for refusing to answer the ridiculously over-simplified question regarding climate change.
I read this Fred blog talking about him making a comeback and taking Iowa. I certainly hope they are on to something. I believe it.
Fred did a tremendous job at that last debate. Kudos to him for refusing to answer the ridiculously over-simplified question regarding climate change.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
